世界の小児専門病院心臓センターで採用され、かつ、日々改定が続けられてすでに15年に及び、世界標準の心カテ及び心臓手術の教科書です。 #メディカルテクニカ #Labtech_Holter #生体情報 #Heart_vest_gTec #Pedcath8 #Mennen_Medical #Vectorcardiography_Labtech_Holter #VitalStream_Caretaker_Medical #Pedcath8_Mennen_Medical #wvelet_algorithm #Piston_Medical_COanalysi
#VitalStream_SOFA_EWS_Decomposition_ECMO_COVID19 #Labtech_Holter_wavelet
#wavelet_Labtech12leadsECG_decomposition_CaretakerMedical #SCD_EWS_proposals
モバイル・スマホ・タブレット・パソコンなどに、12誘導心電図や血行動態などをオンライン・リアルタイムで表示・遠隔表示
2014年5月26日月曜日
Arterial Stiffness
Evaluation of the Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure
monitor according to the protocols of the British
Hypertension Society and the Association for the
Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
Zso´ fia Ne´meth, Katalin Mo´cza´ r and Gyo¨rgy Dea´k
Background The validation of ambulatory blood
pressure monitoring devices is necessary to obtain
information on their accuracy. The objective of the
present study was to evaluate the accuracy of the
Tensioday oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure
monitor according to the protocols of the British
Hypertension Society and the Association for the
Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI).
Design We followed the phases recommended by the
British Hypertension Society protocol: before-use
calibration, in-use assessment, after-use calibration,
static device validation and report of the evaluation.
However, we expanded on the protocol to accommodate
features required by the AAMI.
Method The accuracy of calibration of three Tensioday
devices was tested before and after the in-use phase
when each of three devices was performing 10 24 h
sessions of ambulatory monitoring. As all three devices
passed these phases, the accuracy of blood pressure
measurement was tested in one arbitrarily selected
device on 85 subjects for systolic and 85 for diastolic
blood pressure values. This was done by comparing
three sequential same-arm blood pressure readings
obtained by the device with three readings obtained by
two observers using standard mercury
sphygmomanometer. The comparisons were carried out
while resting in the seated, supine and standing
positions for all subjects. The results were used to grade
the performance of the device according to the British
Hypertension Society protocol and to calculate the mean
7 standard deviation of the difference between the
device and the observers, as required by the AAMI.
Results The Tensioday device achieved an overall
grade of A for both the systolic and diastolic
measurements, and had a mean difference compared
with the observer-measured blood pressure of
1.475.3/1.074.7 mmHg, which satisfies the AAMI
criteria for accuracy. The British Hypertension Society
grading did not change when patients with low, medium,
and high blood pressure were analysed separately. The
AAMI accuracy criteria were fulfilled in the standing and
lying positions as well.
Conclusion On the basis of these results, the
Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device
can be recommended for clinical use for ambulatory
monitoring. The accuracy of the device needs, however,
further testing in special situations, such as in
pregnancy, in elderly patients and during exercise.
Blood Press Monit 7: 191–197 & 2002 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Blood Pressure Monitoring 2002, 7:191^197
Keywords: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, validation, British
Hypertension Society protocol, Association for the Advancement of
Medical Instrumentation standard, hypertension
1st Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University,
Budapest, Hungary.
Conflicts of interest: None.
Correspondence and requests for reprints to Dr Gyo¨rgy Dea´ k, Ph.D., 1st
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 2/a
Koranyi u., Budapest, Hungary, H-1083.
Tel: þ36 1 210 0278/1599; fax: þ36 1 313 0250; e-mail:
deakgy@bel1.sote.hu.
Received 29 August 2001 Revised 21 December 2001
Accepted 27 February 2001
Introduction
Over the past decade, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
(ABPM) has become an integral part of the evaluation
and follow-up of patients with hypertension [1]. Blood
pressure values obtained using ABPM correlate better with
hypertensive target-organ damage, and ABPM provides
prognostic information over and above that provided by
clinic measurements [2]. The use of ABPM in the
evaluation of certain clinical situations, such as white-coat
hypertension, drug-resistant hypertension, drug-induced
hypotension, autonomic failure and treatment efficacy is
endorsed by the Joint National Committee VI [3] and
World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension
[4] guidelines for the evaluation and treatment
of hypertension.
The expansion in the use of ambulatory monitoring has led
to the design and production of a variety of ABPM devices
[5]. Manufacturers are not currently obliged to submit
their devices for an independent validation of accuracy
despite